Article 15 December, 2021

Macro update: December 2021 – Pandemic, Policy and Prices: 2021 in review

After another busy year, we can now reflect on how our macro views fared and what 2022 may have in store for markets.

Written by

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Introduction and background

After another busy year, we can now reflect on how our macro views fared and what 2022 may have in store for markets. 2021 has been notable for the three Ps: the ongoing Pandemic, continued Policy support and rapidly rising Prices. Yet amidst high uncertainty, markets move higher over the year. Those who predicted a swift return to normalcy were instead faced with the highest inflation in decades, a much-changed interest rate outlook, and a pandemic that is expected to wind on with ongoing mutations and vaccinations.
The recovery in asset prices throughout 2021 has not been uniform across asset classes, regions, sectors, and styles, stressing the value of asset allocation and the ability to be dynamic.

As we look ahead, we expect the three Ps to continue to affect asset returns, albeit in a different way to 2021.

Tug of war between policy and inflation

At the turn of the year, we stated a preference for equities over credit, a positive outlook for cyclical sectors, and expected upwards pressure on government bond yields from higher inflation expectations. These themes have played out to varying degrees, detailed below, preparing us for a markedly different economic environment next year.

We expected strong equity returns in 2021, supported by ultra-loose borrowing costs for corporate projects, healthy consumer demand, and policy mitigating much of the potential economic scarring. US household savings remained twice as high as the historical average and consumers used excess income throughout lockdowns to reduce debt. While risks remained, particularly surrounding vaccine take-up, it was our view that policy would provide a backstop to economies and financial markets – the second of our three Ps.

Together, these views presented a powerful case for further equity upside, which played out. While we witnessed periods of volatility, they were mostly contained and presented some buying opportunities. In contrast, expected returns from credit were low and diminishing, inconsistent with the economic risks still prevalent. This is highlighted in the chart overleaf, with valuations implying default rates significantly lower than prior crises.

Our high conviction preference for equities was fitting, with global equities rising c.17% to the end of November 2021 while global high yield credit returned just c.2%. Following a period of such strong returns and with the upcoming tapering of stimulus, we expect positive but more muted equity returns in the future.

Implied default rates were significantly lower than prior crises despite risks remaining

Source: River and Mercantile, 29 January 2021

We also noted asset allocation within equities would be a key driver of returns. 2020 saw sector returns deviate starkly, favouring those business models able to operate under social restrictions. But with vaccine breakthroughs providing a route out of the pandemic (the first of our three Ps), there were opportunities for cyclical companies to recover from their steep falls. At the turn of the year, cyclical sectors looked discernibly cheaper compared to defensive sectors and were set to be supported by the economic recovery. As a result, where we had discretion we targeted cyclical sectors, regions, and styles for much of the first half of 2021. These cyclical sectors rallied strongly throughout the first half of the year and regained much of their underperformance versus defensives, as shown in our indicator below.

There was a compelling case for cyclicals at the turn of the year

Source: River and Mercantile, 29 January 2021

Given stimulus packages dwarfed that of prior recessions we were watchful for a resulting rise in prices and inflation (our third and final P). More critically, we considered policymakers withdrawing support in response to high inflation was the fundamental risk to markets.

We believed higher inflation alone wouldn’t necessarily be detrimental for risk assets, and that has largely borne out-equities have continued to rise despite the highest US CPI since 1990. It was, therefore, important to assess the underlying drivers of inflation to determine just how sustainable we thought inflation could be. In line with higher inflation and economic growth, we expected government bond markets would price in fading central bank stimulus and higher future interest rates. As such, we expected government bond yields to rise throughout the year as economic growth rebounded, but not to such levels that higher yields would weigh on risk asset returns. This gave us confidence to maintain our strong preference for equity, we also expressed this view by largely maintaining low exposure to rising interest rates in the credit portfolio.

What surprised us?

While we expected supply chain bottlenecks to drive inflation higher, our base case was that inflation would moderate as supply chains caught up with demand. But delays in shipping and manufacturing persisted, resulting in higher-for-longer inflation, and bringing forward timelines of future interest rate rises. Remarkably, the largest inflation was in durable goods (for example used cars), bucking the longer-term trend of falling durable goods prices since the late 1990s.

The pandemic strained global supply chains like never seen before—who would have predicted that the price of a used car would rise above their new equivalent? But as policymakers remained committed to their policy frameworks, the uncertainty around inflation was evident in the government bond market. While volatility within equity markets was contained, government bond yields whipsawed and in Q1 2021 suffered their worst quarter of performance in decades.

Government bond volatility has been higher than equities in 2021

Source: Bloomberg, 9 December 2021

China also surprised markets with strict regulations, which had direct and meaningful implications on asset returns. The Chinese administration placed stringent measures on large technology companies, particularly those listed on foreign stock exchanges, and in tandem with the significant default of major real estate company Evergrande, caused Chinese markets (and broader emerging markets) to fall sharply. The steps the Chinese administration took to achieve their goals were profound and we must now factor them into any future allocations.

China dragged Emerging Market performance lower

Source: Bloomberg, 9 December 2021

Where do markets go next?

As we look ahead, we expect a year of leaner returns amidst the withdrawal of policy and expect inflation to continue to dominate the narrative. The latest variant of Covid-19 presents further challenges for governments worldwide, however we expect policymakers will once again pull levers to support economies and markets if forced to do so. We will continue to communicate our macro views as events unfold and will set out our 2022 outlook in more detail in January.

This article has been issued and approved by River and Mercantile Solutions, a division of River and Mercantile Investments Limited which is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority (Firm Reference No. 195028; registered in England and Wales No. 3359127) and is a subsidiary of River and Mercantile Group Plc (registered in England and Wales No. 04035248), with its registered office at 30 Coleman Street, London EC2R 5AL. Please note that all material produced by River and Mercantile Investments Limited is directed at, and intended for, the consideration of professional clients only within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”). Retail clients must not place any reliance upon the contents .The information expressed has been provided in good faith and has been prepared using sources considered to be reasonable and appropriate. While this information from third parties is believed to be reliable, no representations, guarantees or warranties are made as to the accuracy of information presented, and no responsibility or liability can be accepted for any error, omission or inaccuracy in respect of this. This article may also include our views and expectations, which cannot be taken as fact. The value of investments and any income generated may go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. An investor may not get back the amount originally invested. Past performance is not a reliable guide to future results. Changes in exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of investments. This document is confidential and is intended for the recipient only. Unauthorised copying of this document is prohibited.

Fiduciary Management

We take on the complexity of your day-to-day investment decisions on your behalf, partnering with you to help you deliver on your long-term objectives.


Latest perspectives

Macro update: December 2021 – Pandemic, Policy and Prices: 2021 in review

Macro update: December 2021 – ...

Article 15 December, 2021

After another busy year, we can now reflect on how our macro views fared and…

6 min read

Applying ESG factors to different asset classes

Applying ESG factors to different ...

Article 10 November, 2021

With most DB pensions de-risking and equities becoming a smaller component of assets, people are…

3 min read

Macro update: October 2021

Macro update: October 2021

Article 21 October, 2021

Welcome to our monthly macro update. Here we provide an overview of our current market…

4 min read

Sign up to our newsletters

Stay ahead of the curve by receiving our newsletter containing current industry developments and insights.